• Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • About
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Forthcoming Issue
    • Archive
    • Subject Index
  • Discourse
  • Mastheads
  • Events & Honors
    • Awards & Banquet
    • Constitutional Law Symposium
  • Contact
    • Submissions
    • Orders & Subscriptions
    • Comments & Mailing Address

Exclusionary Rule: A Case Study in Judicial Usurpation…..34:33

Nix v. Williams (U.S. Sup. Ct. 1984)—Under the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine, the Prosecution May Submit “Tainted Evidence” if It Can Establish by a Preponderance of the Evidence that the Information Ultimately or Inevitably Would Have Been Discovered by Lawful Means…..34:863

United States v. Mahoney (5th Cir. 1983)—Evidence Obtained by Police Officers in the Course of Action that Is Taken in Good Faith and in the Reasonable—Though Mistaken—Belief that they Are Authorized, Shall Not Be Suppressed Under the Exclusionary Rule…..34:257

THE DRAKE LAW REVIEW, A DRAKE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL PUBLICATION.
EST. 1951


  • DLR Facebook
  • DLR LinkedIn
  • DLR Instagram

Copyright 2022 The Drake Law Review. All Rights Reserved.


2507 University Avenue
Des Moines, Iowa 50311

Phone: (515) 271-2930
Fax: (515) 271-4926
Email: law.review@drake.edu

  • Follow Following
    • Drake Law Review
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Drake Law Review
    • Edit Site
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar